|
January 2008
It has been two years since I became
an unlicensed person. I have saved £402.50 by not paying TVL/BBC. Today,
I receive my 21st letter.

The statement "Action required immediately" is a lie;
there is no "requirement" for me to take action; TVL/BBC may request
action, and I am entitled to ignore them. The back of the envelope has a bold
black flap:

Inside:

Mr Hales says
that the TVL/BBC caught "32,336 evaders" last month. I wonder whether this is
another bogus figure. If anyone out there has the same figure for a different
month, or in another region, I would be interested to
hear.
February 2008
This envelope,
like the one above, has a black flap on the reverse. There is a message waiting
for me when I remove the letter:

The envelope
says Notification of Impending Action. This is the third such envelope to say
so, the other two being in May and October 2007.
Inside:

There is also a leaflet enclosed, which I have
received twice before:
March 2008
A similar envelope type as last month,
but 9 by 6-inch rather than 9 by
4:

After a long
run of the same letter formats, TVL/BBC has come up with something
new:

The psychological purpose of parts A and B is to induce the
reader into selecting at least one of them. This is a technique commonly used
in sales, whereby prospective customers are presented with options A and B with
the aim of creating thoughts as to which option is chosen, not
whether one of the two options is
chosen.
TVL/BBC reduces the option of not using TV (they mean receiving
broadcasts) to a footnote, and ties to it the condition that the reader should
telephone TVL/BBC and expect a visit. The option that the BBC leaves people
alone is not listed.
Here is the return form for option
A:
April 2008
The BBC is lying to me again by saying
that action is "required" on the front of the envelope.

Inside, I am
greeted by TVL/BBC's new logo, which omits the trademark symbol ("TM" in a
circle). This gives the impression that TV Licensing is an organisation rather
than the brand name it is.

I also note
that Mr Hales has changed signatures:
I used to compare signatures on high value cheques in a bank and
can state categorically that this pair will fail any comparison test. The new
signature is broader and more relaxed; the J starts from a pronounced curve;
the top of the J sweeps across; the top of the A is not closed; the L is not
looped; the letters are not joined up; and the signature is not underlined.
Finally, the new signature is level, whereas the previous signature is written
at an angle.
These signatures are not by the same person, and I conclude that
"John Hales" is not real. This is the second time the BBC has misled me as to
the identity of the person writing to me;
click
here for "Val Smith".
I am disappointed that despite the
exposure of the BBC's bogus phone-in contests, its withholding of charity money
and other deceptions, the BBC still regards misleading people and using false
information as permissable.
May 2008

Inside:

Enclosed with
the letter is the same leaflet as received in February (see above). This is the
fourth time I have received this particular leaflet. Since the only difference
is the change in payment total and TVL/BBC logo, I will save on visitors'
downloading time by not reproducing it.
June 2008

Inside:

Previously, letters were from the London South
Enforcement Team; this one indicates London South West. Looking at my
previous letters, I see that the letter of May 2006 refers to London South
East. I do not see how I can be switched from London South East to
London South West; my property has not moved.
July 2008

Inside:

We have switched departments again: the June letter
was from the London South Enforcement Team; this one is from the "UK
Enforcement Division". Does that mean there are enforcement divisions outside
the UK?
August 2008

Inside:

September 2008
A short envelope this
month:
 Inside, a
letter that is 1½ inches narrower than
usual:
 There is also
a leaflet, similar to ones received before, but shorter in length; is TVL/BBC
economising on paper?:
October 2008
The envelope appears white below but
is in fact pale blue, similar to that received in March
2007:
Inside:

November 2008
Another narrow envelope:
Inside:

December
2008
Inside:

|
|